Bargaining with Externalities∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper studies bargaining between a seller and multiple buyers with externalities. A full characterization of the stationary subgame perfect equilibria in generic games is presented. Equilibria exist for generic parameter values, with delay only for strong positive externalities. The outcome is efficient if externalities are not too positive. Increasing the bargaining power of the seller decreases the set of parameter values for which only efficient equilibria exist. The paper generalizes the model presented in Jehiel & Moldovanu (1995a and 1995b). Where they find delay equilibria, we find mixed equilibria, except for a region where no stationary equilibria exist. These mixed equilibria entail no delay and the equilibrium strategies converges to pure as the discount factor approaches one. We are able to show existence of stationary equilibria given a reasonable restriction on parameters. We find delay with strong positive externalities, due to a hold-up problem. All equilibria without delay have the property that agreement is with a specific buyer in the limit.
منابع مشابه
Stationary equilibria in bargaining with externalities
This paper studies infinite-horizon bargaining between a seller and multiple buyers when externalities are present. We extend the analysis in Jehiel & Moldovanu (1995a) by allowing for both pure and mixed equilibria. A characterization of the stationary subgame perfect equilibria in generic games is presented. Equilibria with delay exist only for strong positive externalities. Since each buyer ...
متن کاملBargaining, Values and Implementation with Coalitional Externalities
The paper starts by proposing an explicit and intuitive bargaining process to analyze coalitional externalities, which we then use to generate a value allocation extending the Shapley value to partition function from games, the Rational Belief Shapley value (RBS). We investigate the strategic foundation of the value by constructing a mechanism implementing it. It extends existing models of mult...
متن کاملCoordination and bargaining power in contracting with externalities
Building on Genicot and Ray (2006) we develop a model on non-cooperative bargaining that combines the two main approaches in the literature of contracting with externalities: the o¤er game (in which the principal makes simultaneous o¤ers to the agents) and the bidding game (in which the agents make simultaneous o¤ers to the principal). Allowing for agent coordination, we show that the outcome o...
متن کاملIn Economics and Social Sciences Working Papers Series Bargaining, Coalitions and Externalities: a Comment on Maskin Bargaining, Coalitions and Externalities: a Comment on Maskin *
We first observe that two of Maskin’s results do not extend beyond three players: we construct a four-player partition function with nonpositive externalities whose unique solution is inefficient, as well as a four-player characteristic function that has a unique efficient solution for each ordering of the players, but for which the payoff vector obtained by averaging these solutions over the d...
متن کاملValuations and Dynamics of Negotiations
This paper analyzes three-party negotiations in the presence of externalities, deriving a close form solution for the stationary subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of a standard non-cooperative bargaining model. Players’ values are monotonically increasing (or decreasing) in the amount of negative (or positive) externalities that they impose on others. Moreover, players’ values are continuous and...
متن کامل